PI quality is worst need to improve it
M
Mehta Akshat Rohitkumar
I’ve been using Pi regularly for the past year, and this month I upgraded to a paid plan expecting a meaningful improvement especially for PPT generation with one click feature.
Frankly, the experience has been unacceptable.
I provided a fully structured input with 25 complete slides and clear requirements. Despite multiple attempts, the tool consistently failed to generate a usable presentation. The output ignored key instructions, broke formatting, and did not reflect the provided content at all.
This is not a minor issue it’s a fundamental failure in handling structured input.
What’s worse is that every failed attempt consumed credits, meaning I paid for outputs that were not even remotely usable. That’s not just disappointing it’s a poor user experience for a paid service.
When users provide clean, slide-ready content, the minimum expectation is accurate conversion and proper formatting. Right now, that expectation is clearly not being met.
There needs to be serious attention given to:
Output reliability
Requirement adherence
Quality consistency for paid users
Charging for a service that cannot handle basic structured tasks like PPT generation raises valid concerns about overall product readiness.
I hope the team prioritizes fixing these gaps instead of scaling a product that isn’t delivering on core expectations.
P
Presentation Intelligence
Dear User,
Thank you so much for your support — we truly appreciate it.
As a small token of our gratitude, we’ve added 2000 credits to your account.
We have also forwarded your feedback to our team for further review. Thank you for helping us improve Pi.
We hope you enjoy using Pi, and please feel free to reach out anytime if you need assistance.
Best regards,
Pi Support Team